The ongoing party clash over comments regarding the sacrifice of Grigoris Afxentiou shows no signs of subsiding, following remarks made by MEP Fidias Panayiotou during a podcast.
- The ongoing party clash over comments regarding the sacrifice of Grigoris Afxentiou shows no signs of subsiding, following remarks made by MEP Fidias Panayiotou during a podcast.
The controversial statements stemmed from a discussion with journalist-historian Michalis Michael, where it was suggested that Afxentiou, a revered figure in the EOKA movement, either committed suicide or was executed by a fellow fighter.
In response to the outrage, the Movement for Social Democracy (EDEK) issued a strong statement calling for Panayiotou’s resignation, labelling him as “dangerous for Cyprus, its people, and the cause of Cyprus.” This sentiment was echoed by the Democratic Party (DIPA), which condemned the attempt to distort Afxentiou’s historical legacy and highlighted his significance as a symbol of the struggle for freedom.
President Nikos Christodoulides also weighed in on the controversy, sharing a photo of Afxentiou’s wanted poster on his personal Instagram account with a caption quoting the hero’s own words: “In my last hour, I will fight and die like a Greek, but they will not take me alive.”
Other political parties joined the fray, with the Democratic Rally (DISY) denouncing Panayiotou’s claims as an insult to Afxentiou’s sacrifice. They asserted that the narrative surrounding the hero’s legacy should not be altered for personal or ideological gain.
Similarly, the Democratic Alignment (DIKO) stressed the need to protect the memories of national heroes from being embroiled in political disputes. They affirmed that Afxentiou’s sacrifice is a cornerstone of national dignity and should be treated with the utmost respect.
ELAM, another political party, accused AKEL of attempting to rewrite history, referencing past actions of the party and asserting that their narrative undermines the significant contributions of Afxentiou and other heroes of the EOKA struggle.
In a response to the backlash, AKEL defended its position, stating that Afxentiou represents an unparalleled symbol of self-sacrifice in the anti-colonial struggle. They argued that the comments by Michalis Michael were misconstrued and that his focus was on the essence of Afxentiou’s bravery rather than the specifics of his death.
The tension escalated as DISY rebuffed AKEL’s defence, reiterating that the manner of Afxentiou’s sacrifice is crucial and cannot be diminished by leftist ideologies. They insisted that the integrity of historical narratives must be maintained, asserting that such discussions are not merely academic but deeply personal and nationalistic.
The ongoing conflict illustrates the deep-seated divisions within Cypriot politics regarding historical narratives and national identity. As the debate rages on, the calls for respect and preservation of Afxentiou’s legacy continue to resonate across the political spectrum.