Tag: Syllouris

  • Syllouris and Giovanis Maintain Innocence in Golden Passports Case

    Syllouris and Giovanis Maintain Innocence in Golden Passports Case

    In a significant development in the golden passports trial, former parliament speaker Demetris Syllouris pleaded not guilty on Thursday before Nicosia’s Criminal Court. He is facing charges alongside Christakis Giovanis, who also insists he acted lawfully and without wrongdoing.

    • This authorisation letter from March 2015 is pivotal as it supports Syllouris's claims regarding his official capacity and the legitimacy of his actions in the context of the golden passports scheme.
    • This trial is poised to remain in the public eye, drawing attention to the broader implications of the golden passports scheme and its impact on Cyprus's international reputation.

    Defendants’ Stance on Allegations

    During the hearing, Syllouris expressed his commitment to addressing the accusations directly. He stated, “I declare categorically that I am innocent of all charges I face in this case, which has completely unjustly caused enormous problems for me and my family.” His unsworn statement underlined his belief that he did not violate the law in any capacity regarding the golden passports scheme.

    Giovanis echoed Syllouris’s sentiments in his own unsworn statement, asserting that he had not committed any illegal acts. He explained that the documents he signed in the Nikolay Gornovsky case were either requested or drafted by lawyer Andreas Pittadjis, who represents both him and the Group. “I never thought or believed there was anything reprehensible, nor did I do anything reprehensible,” Giovanis stated.

    Details of the Golden Passports Scheme

    The golden passports scheme in question has garnered considerable attention, as it involves allegations of corruption surrounding the issuance of citizenship to foreign investors. The case has drawn scrutiny from both local and international media, particularly considering the high-profile nature of the defendants.

    During the proceedings, Syllouris maintained that he closely followed the court’s testimony and reiterated his position that he did not engage in any actions that would satisfy the charges. His defence seeks to establish that the actions taken were part of legitimate parliamentary duties.

    Testimony from Former Parliamentary Director

    As the trial progressed, Sokratis Sokratous, the former Director General of Parliament, provided testimony on the official trips undertaken by Syllouris during his tenure as Speaker. Sokratous confirmed that an official visit to China took place in November 2019, led by Syllouris, where discussions on imports and exports were held.

    According to Sokratous, the selection of Members of Parliament (MPs) for participation in such trips is made exclusively by their respective parties. He defended the necessity of these visits, emphasising their role within the framework of parliamentary diplomacy, which aims to promote Cyprus’s economic, cultural, and political interests abroad.

    Insights into Parliamentary Diplomacy

    Sokratous elaborated on the operations of parliamentary diplomacy, explaining that it allows Parliament to function autonomously when promoting the Republic’s interests. He highlighted the importance of attracting foreign investment, noting that parliamentary delegations are often accompanied by representatives from the Cyprus Investment Promotion Agency (CIPA).

    The focus on economic relations with non-EU countries is a crucial aspect of this diplomatic effort. Sokratous clarified that the aim is not only to foster political ties but also to enhance economic prospects for Cyprus.

    Submission of Evidence

    During the hearing, the court agreed to admit a letter from the former President of Cyprus, which provided authorisation for Syllouris to attract investments to the country. Initially, the secretary of the former President was to appear in court to confirm the document, but her presence was deemed unnecessary after the prosecution consented to submit it as evidence.

    This authorisation letter from March 2015 is pivotal as it supports Syllouris’s claims regarding his official capacity and the legitimacy of his actions in the context of the golden passports scheme.

    Next Steps in the Trial

    The proceedings are set to continue with further hearings scheduled. The next session is slated for 15 September at 10am, where witnesses called by Giovanis’s defence team will be examined. As the trial unfolds, both defendants are expected to maintain their positions of innocence, with their legal teams prepared to counter the allegations brought against them.

    This trial is poised to remain in the public eye, drawing attention to the broader implications of the golden passports scheme and its impact on Cyprus’s international reputation.

  • Corruption Trial: Anastasiades’ Letter Reveals Links to Golden Passports Scheme

    Corruption Trial: Anastasiades’ Letter Reveals Links to Golden Passports Scheme

    golden passports — The corruption trial involving Demetris Syllouris and Christakis Giovanis has shed light on the role of former President Nicos Anastasiades in the controversial golden passports scheme. A secretary who managed correspondence for Anastasiades will testify as a defence witness, further intertwining the former president’s legacy with the allegations at hand.

    The pivotal letter, which granted Syllouris, a former House Speaker, and others authority to attract foreign investments to Cyprus, was sent in the wake of the 2013 economic crisis. Defence lawyer Christos Triantafyllides plans to call this secretary, along with another witness, to affirm the legitimacy of their actions as aimed at rejuvenating the Cypriot economy.

    At the core of the trial are serious allegations against Syllouris and Giovanis, including conspiracy to subvert the Republic and influencing a public official. These charges emerged after an Al Jazeera documentary aired in October 2020, which exposed how the citizenship investment programme was allegedly exploited for personal gain. Following the exposé, both defendants resigned from their official positions.

    The undercover investigation revealed that Syllouris and Giovanis offered assistance to a fictitious Chinese businessman, promising him a streamlined process to acquire Cypriot citizenship in exchange for a substantial investment of at least €2.15 million. Syllouris’s assurances included claims that the applicant had a “99 percent” chance of success, raising eyebrows about the integrity of the programme.

    Evidence presented by the prosecution includes allegations that Syllouris received €200,000 for services rendered to Giovanis’s property company, with additional payments involving his daughter. This raised further questions regarding the extent of their financial dealings and possible conflicts of interest.

    Compounding these issues is the revelation that a law firm founded by Anastasiades, now operated by his daughters, processed numerous golden passport applications during his presidency. Critics have pointed out a clear conflict of interest, particularly given that 137 individuals were granted citizenship through this law firm while Anastasiades was in office.

    The Nicolatos inquiry committee reported that 53 percent of the 6,779 citizenships granted under the scheme between 2007 and August 2020 were unlawful. The committee’s findings suggested that while politicians bore political responsibilities, certain individuals involved in the application process may face criminal charges.

    As the trial progresses, Triantafyllides has requested a postponement, citing scheduling conflicts for the two witnesses. Giovanis’s defence counsel is also prepared to present witnesses, including family members, to support their case.

    The three-member judicial panel agreed to delay proceedings until Thursday to ensure all relevant witnesses could attend. The fallout from the Al Jazeera revelations has led to the termination of the Cyprus Investment Programme and prompted legal action from the European Union, highlighting concerns about the programme’s integrity and the individuals it attracted.