cyprus sovereignty — cyprus sovereignty — The issue of Cyprus surrendering sovereignty to Israel has ignited controversy following the Presidential Palace’s decision to disseminate a directive from Israel’s Diaspora Minister. This letter, addressed to municipalities and communities, calls for the removal of political slogans from public spaces, raising concerns over foreign interference in domestic affairs.
The directive originated from a circular issued by Israel’s Ministry of Diaspora Affairs, which prompted the Interior Ministry of Cyprus to pass on the request to every municipality across the island. The Interior Ministry explicitly stated that they had received “instructions to forward” the Israeli request, detailing directives from Interior Minister Constantinos Ioannou that focused on the removal of alleged antisemitic slogans.
The Movement of Ecologists – Citizens’ Cooperation has strongly condemned this action, labelling it a serious retreat from the principle of sovereignty. In a statement released on 22nd September 2025, the movement argued that “Cyprus cannot function under the instructions of any third country.” They view this situation as a dangerous precedent that undermines the country’s independence.
The Israeli circular specifically targeted four pieces of graffiti that were deemed problematic. Among the images included was a depiction of a Palestinian flag held near two heart-shaped balloons, referencing an incident during a football match in July between Pafos FC and Israeli team Maccabi Tel Aviv. Other controversial artworks showcased included the word “Gaza” painted in blood red above a baby image and a tin labelled “genocide” leaking red paint, alongside inflammatory phrases above a modified Israeli flag.
Municipal leaders, including Larnaca mayor Andreas Vyras, have publicly rejected the ministry’s instructions. Vyras, who also serves as the chairman of the union of Cyprus municipalities, stated firmly, “We do not accept suggestions from third parties, even more so from any foreign country.” He highlighted that municipalities are capable of addressing issues of genuine hate speech and violence without needing external direction, emphasising that “freedom of expression is non-negotiable.”
Concerns around freedom of expression have been raised by the Movement of Ecologists, who argue that limiting such freedoms to appease foreign governments constitutes an attack on democracy. They stress that the ability to express oneself, as long as it doesn’t cross into hate speech, is essential to a functioning democracy. The movement has called for the immediate withdrawal of the circular and for the government to respect the will of its citizens, thereby ensuring the protection of the country’s independence and democratic rights.











